fashion-memopad
fashion-memopad

Memo Pad: Second Opinion... Jagger Jigsaw... A little Light Music

In Touch is about to find out how serious a breathless celebrity tabloid can really get. The weekly from Bauer Publishing is forgoing its usual cover mix of Britney, Lindsay and Brangelina.

fashion-memopad/news
SECOND OPINION: In Touch is about to find out how serious a breathless celebrity tabloid can really get. The weekly from Bauer Publishing is forgoing its usual cover mix of Britney, Lindsay and Brangelina to focus on the tragedy at Virginia Tech, where 32 people were murdered. For this week's issue, which hits newsstands today, the magazine bumped the celebrity headlines that normally make up its main cover image for the Virginia Tech shooting, leaving stories on Hollywood hookups relegated to smaller images on the side.

The title — and, for that matter, celebrity weeklies Star, Us Weekly and Life & Style — rarely puts real-people stories on its cover or even inside, but such stories play to People's roots of mixing real-life stories with celebrity events and giving cover space to national tragedies, from the Amish shootings last summer to the killing of Jon Benet Ramsey. People, which appears on newsstands Friday, is likely to put the Virginia shooting on its cover with an extensive feature package inside, as are the newsweeklies Time and Newsweek. (People declined to comment.)

In Touch editor in chief Richard Spencer was convinced the Virginia story was worth covering in a major way after watching his staff's obsession with the news. "When you see everybody stopping in the office, in horror, you say, ‘Oh, I want to read this,'" said Spencer. "When so many people have died, [it is] hard to be so fixated on how crazy Britney [Spears] is acting."

In Touch covered the tragedy in four pages, mostly in photographs. The Bauer title also had a good source at the scene — a features editor has a brother who works at Virginia Tech.

Media observers will be watching newsstands sales for the week to see if In Touch eats into newsstand sales of People. Meanwhile, Us Weekly said it would not cover the tragedy in its pages. —Stephanie D. Smith

JAGGER JIGSAW: The Times of London jumped the gun on news of Jade Jagger's fate at Garrard — and got it wrong. In an article published Saturday, the Times Magazine referred to Jagger as "the erstwhile creative director of Garrard" — which was news to everyone, including the folks at the venerable jewelry house. According to a spokeswoman for Garrard, Jagger, who has been creative director since 2001, is still negotiating her contract with the house. Jagger's spokeswoman confirmed this. The author of the Times piece, Lucia Van Der Post, a veteran fashion and luxury goods journalist who once edited the Financial Times' "How to Spend It" column, said the error was due to a slip of the pen. "I think I might have made a mistake," Van Der Post told WWD. It was an easy one to make: Negotiations between Garrard and Jagger have been rumbling on since last June, when the creative director's contract expired. The Garrard spokeswoman would not confirm when Jagger's contract would be renewed, but said, "hopefully, soon." — Samantha Conti
Page: 
  • 1
  • 2
Next »
VIEW ARTICLE IN ONE PAGE
load comments

ADD A COMMENT

Sign in using your Facebook or Twitter account, or simply type your comment below as a guest by entering your email and name. Your email address will not be shared. Please note that WWD reserves the right to remove profane, distasteful or otherwise inappropriate language.
News from WWD
Newsletters

Sign upSign up for WWD and FN newsletters to receive daily headlines, breaking news alerts and weekly industry wrap-ups.

LatestPublications
getIsArchiveOnly= hasAccess=false hasArchiveAccess=false