fashion-scoops
fashion-scoops

Marion Cotillard for Dior... Fashion on the Hill... Jurlique CEO on the Move...

Marion Cotillard’s latest campaign for Dior — co-starring the chain-handled Miss Dior handbag — breaks Monday in Italian magazine Amica.

View Slideshow

FASHION ON THE HILL: Legislation that would protect fashion designers and apparel brands from knockoffs is expected to get a new look from Congress soon. The House Judiciary subcommittee on Intellectual Property, Competition and the Internet is expected to reveal today that a hearing on the bill has been slated for July 15, according to industry sources. Fashion designers have testified at past hearings on the legislation, but a witness list for the upcoming hearing was not made available.

The House subcommittee, chaired by Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R., Va.) is slated to consider a bill co-sponsored by Sen. Charles Schumer (D., N.Y.), known as the “Innovative Design Protection and Piracy Prevent Act,” industry sources said. It would expand copyright laws for the first time to include fashion designs that are often the target of knockoff artists who profit from another’s design creation. Goodlatte’s spokeswoman would not confirm whether the hearing has been scheduled.

While the bill has run into opposition through the legislative process, the two major fashion groups leading the effort — the American Apparel & Footwear Association and Council of Fashion Designers of America — forged a compromise last August, clearing the path for its advancement. The Senate Judiciary Committee unanimously approved the bipartisan bill, led by Schumer, last year, but it did not move beyond that committee. In a new session of Congress, the legislation will have to be introduced in the House and Senate, pass both chambers and be signed by the President to become law.

The Schumer bill, which industry sources said will be the template, would extend copyright protection to “unique and original” designs for a period of three years. The bill covers only “deliberate copies that are substantially identical to the protected designs.” All designs created in the public domain prior to enactment of the bill would be exempt and protection extends automatically to designs without registration. A “heightened pleading standard” requires a plaintiff in a lawsuit to prove the design is “protectable, substantially identical” and that the defendant had access to, or was aware of, the “protected design.”

View Slideshow
Page:  « Previous Next »
VIEW ARTICLE IN ONE PAGE
load comments

ADD A COMMENT

Sign in using your Facebook or Twitter account, or simply type your comment below as a guest by entering your email and name. Your email address will not be shared. Please note that WWD reserves the right to remove profane, distasteful or otherwise inappropriate language.
News from WWD
Newsletters

Sign upSign up for WWD and FN newsletters to receive daily headlines, breaking news alerts and weekly industry wrap-ups.

LatestPublications
getIsArchiveOnly= hasAccess=false hasArchiveAccess=false