Women’s Wear Daily
04.24.2014
beauty-features
beauty-features

Estée Lauder, Clinique File Suit Against Preferred Fragrance....

The Estée Lauder Cos. Inc. and Clinique Laboratories Inc. have filed a lawsuit against Preferred Fragrance Inc. alleging trademark infringement in connection with alleged knockoffs of Lauder-branded fragrances.

beauty-features/news
Lab Series’ Mild Foaming Face Wash

Lab Series’ Mild Foaming Face Wash.

Photo By WWD Staff

Most Recent Articles In Beauty Features
Most Recent Articles In Beauty Features
The Estée Lauder Cos. Inc. and Clinique Laboratories Inc. have filed a lawsuit against Preferred Fragrance Inc. alleging trademark infringement in connection with alleged knockoffs of Lauder-branded fragrances.

The lawsuit, filed in Manhattan federal court on June 11, also alleges unfair competition, false advertising and dilution. Other named defendants include Preferred's owner, Izriel Polatsek, also known as Ezriel Polatsek; CVS Inc.; CVS Pharmacy Inc. and CVS Caremark Corp.; Family Dollar Stores Inc., and John Does 1-10.

The lawsuit said that Brooklyn, N.Y.-based Preferred is a "known infringer that previously has copied — and previously has been sued for its copying of — famous perfume brands." It said the Brooklyn firm appropriated Lauder's marks for its own use for its line of knockoff products that it has begun selling or soon will sell for the holiday 2008 season in stores such as CVS and Family Dollar. The lawsuit charged that Preferred trades on the "investment" of others as it copies the scents of famous designer fragrances. An example is Obsession, which Preferred allegedly called Fascination in its knockoff scent. Another is White Diamonds, which was called Round Diamonds, the lawsuit charged.

Impression of Beautiful by Estée Lauder, Impression of Pleasures by Estée Lauder, Impression of Happy by Clinique and Impression of Cashmere Mist by Donna Karan are among the Lauder products that allegedly were knocked off by Preferred, the lawsuit said.

Lauder said it was concerned consumers are likely to believe that, due to the defendants' conduct, the knocked-off products are associated with it instead of Preferred.

Lauder also said sales of its Beautiful line are in excess of $400 million in the U.S., while those of its Pleasures line are over $300 million at retail in the U.S., with Beautiful the number-one selling prestige fragrance in America and Pleasures ranking number two. In addition, the company said it has spent tens of millions of dollars to advertise and promote its brands. It is also is the exclusive licensee of the Donna Karan and Donna Karan Cashmere Mist fragrance line and is the owner of the Clinique and Clinique Happy marks, the lawsuit said.

Lauder is seeking injunctive relief, an accounting of sales and profits, damages and attorneys' fees.
Page:  Next »
VIEW ARTICLE IN ONE PAGE
load comments

ADD A COMMENT

Sign in using your Facebook or Twitter account, or simply type your comment below as a guest by entering your email and name. Your email address will not be shared. Please note that WWD reserves the right to remove profane, distasteful or otherwise inappropriate language.

Ads by Google

Newsletters
Newsletters

Sign upSign up for WWD and FN newsletters to receive daily headlines, breaking news alerts and weekly industry wrap-ups.

Publications

ArticleFinder

Beauty


Choose By

Clear

How it works

Close

Lorem Ipsum
Dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Vivamus ac nibh et risus lobortis scelerisque tempor nec enim. Etiam facilisis sapien sit amet.

Lorem Ipsum
Dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Vivamus ac nibh et risus lobortis scelerisque tempor nec enim. Etiam facilisis sapien sit amet.

Lorem Ipsum
Dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Vivamus ac nibh et risus lobortis scelerisque tempor nec enim. Etiam facilisis sapien sit amet.

Lorem Ipsum
Dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Vivamus ac nibh et risus lobortis scelerisque tempor nec enim. Etiam facilisis sapien sit amet.

Lorem Ipsum
Dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Vivamus ac nibh et risus lobortis scelerisque tempor nec enim. Etiam facilisis sapien sit amet.


Or